Scroll ↓

NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC LEARNING · KEYNOTE 2

🏙️

Unit 8

Connecting Citizens

Urban activism · Civic engagement · Digital communities

Lead-in 01

If you could change one thing about your city, what would it be?

Cities are growing faster than ever — but are citizens growing apart? Think about what makes a city feel like home, and what makes people feel heard.

🗳️

Voting

Have your say in city decisions

🏞️

Public Spaces

Parks, plazas, community areas

📲

Digital Networks

Online communities & activism

🤝

Community

Neighbours, friendships, belonging

Alessandra Orofino saw these problems in her megacity — and launched a revolution. Let's read her story.

Reading 02

Skimming Task ⏱️

Read quickly (90 seconds). Answer three big questions:

👤

Who?

Who is the key person in this article?

🌆

Where?

What city is the focus, and why?

💡

What?

What did she create to solve the problem?

✅ Who: Alessandra Orofino — urban activist & co-founder of Meu Rio  |  Where: Rio de Janeiro — a megacity of 11M+ growing rapidly over 60 years  |  What: Meu Rio — an online civic network giving citizens a voice in city decisions

Section Heading

A Growing Megacity

Rio de Janeiro — one city, one story, one glimpse of a global trend

Reading 03

Identity & Place

Urban activist Alessandra Orofino's home city of Rio de Janeiro is one of the world's megacities. With a population of over 11 million, Rio has grown extremely quickly over the last 60 years. But Rio is not unique. Cities around the world are growing at similar speeds. Today, around half the world's population lives in cities, and nearly 2 billion new residents are expected in the next 20 years.
"Urban" narrows the noun "activist" to a specific domain — cities. It tells us she doesn't just campaign for abstract causes; her concern is concrete, place-based. The compound noun creates a character label at sentence-opening, signalling that the article is about a person driven by civic purpose. It also subtly positions the reader to expect agency: activists act; they don't just observe.
Reading 04

Scale of Growth

Urban activist Alessandra Orofino's home city of Rio de Janeiro is one of the world's megacities. With a population of over 11 million, Rio has grown extremely quickly over the last 60 years. But Rio is not unique. Cities around the world are growing at similar speeds. Today, around half the world's population lives in cities, and nearly 2 billion new residents are expected in the next 20 years.
Present perfect continuous ("has grown") links a past process to the present moment — Rio's growth began decades ago and is still relevant now. Simple past ("grew") would place the growth entirely in the past, as if it were over. The phrase "over the last 60 years" confirms duration up to the present. This tense choice argues that the problem is ongoing, making Orofino's work feel urgent and timely rather than historical.
Reading 05

Concessive Pivot

Urban activist Alessandra Orofino's home city of Rio de Janeiro is one of the world's megacities. With a population of over 11 million, Rio has grown extremely quickly over the last 60 years. But Rio is not unique. Cities around the world are growing at similar speeds. Today, around half the world's population lives in cities, and nearly 2 billion new residents are expected in the next 20 years.
Structurally, this pivot sentence performs a scope expansion: it redirects the reader's focus from one specific city to the whole world. Rhetorically, the brevity creates emphasis — short sentences stand out. "Not unique" uses negative construction to deliver a surprising claim: despite Rio's scale, it is ordinary among megacities. This sets up the global evidence that follows, broadening the article's claim from a local story to a universal warning.
Reading 06

Global Urbanisation

Urban activist Alessandra Orofino's home city of Rio de Janeiro is one of the world's megacities. With a population of over 11 million, Rio has grown extremely quickly over the last 60 years. But Rio is not unique. Cities around the world are growing at similar speeds. Today, around half the world's population lives in cities, and nearly 2 billion new residents are expected in the next 20 years.
Present perfect ("have grown") emphasises a result: the change has already happened and affects the present. Present continuous ("are growing") emphasises an ongoing action still in progress right now. Using both in the same paragraph is deliberate: S2 shows what has already changed; S4 shows the process is still happening. Together, they create a sense of both accumulated scale and unstoppable momentum.
Reading 07

Staggering Numbers

Urban activist Alessandra Orofino's home city of Rio de Janeiro is one of the world's megacities. With a population of over 11 million, Rio has grown extremely quickly over the last 60 years. But Rio is not unique. Cities around the world are growing at similar speeds. Today, around half the world's population lives in cities, and nearly 2 billion new residents are expected in the next 20 years.
The passive voice hides the agent — we don't know if it's demographers, the UN, or governments who expect this. This is strategic: by omitting the agent, the author presents the projection as objective fact rather than one group's estimate, making it harder to dismiss. The passive also keeps the sentence focused on the scale of the phenomenon ("2 billion new residents") rather than on the credibility of sources — a common journalistic technique for presenting statistics authoritatively.

Section Heading

City Life: Promise & Problem

Why people move to cities — and what Orofino sees that others miss

Reading 08

Reasons for City Growth

Cities are growing because of the advantages they offer. Residents are provided with convenience, culture, and jobs. But Orofino believes that modern city life is far from ideal.
This is a classic concede-then-challenge structure: acknowledge the mainstream view first, then introduce the counter-argument. It makes the argument feel fair — the author isn't ignoring the benefits of cities. It also makes Orofino's critique more powerful: she's not anti-city; she accepts the advantages but sees what others overlook. Structurally, this "agree before disagreeing" pattern is persuasive because it pre-empts pushback.
Reading 09

Passive Recipients

Cities are growing because of the advantages they offer. Residents are provided with convenience, culture, and jobs. But Orofino believes that modern city life is far from ideal.
In the passive, residents receive things; they don't create or choose them. Grammatically, the city (unnamed agent) has the power; residents are passive beneficiaries. This subtly foreshadows Orofino's core concern: citizens are being served but not heard. They consume the city rather than shape it. The choice of passive is thus not just stylistic — it embeds the power dynamic that Orofino wants to challenge. A careful reader spots the irony: even in a sentence celebrating city life, citizens are grammatically powerless.
Reading 10

The Critical Turn

Cities are growing because of the advantages they offer. Residents are provided with convenience, culture, and jobs. But Orofino believes that modern city life is far from ideal.
"Not ideal" is mild — it merely says something falls short. "Far from ideal" is much stronger: the word "far" indicates a significant distance from the standard, suggesting the problem is serious, not minor. "Not perfect" would be even weaker, implying only small flaws. The phrase "far from ideal" is also rhetorically elegant: it does not say the city is bad — only that it is nowhere near as good as it should be. This measured language reflects Orofino's nuanced, constructive stance.

Section Heading

The Disconnection Problem

Disconnected from the city. Disconnected from each other.

Reading 11

Civic Disconnection

According to Orofino, people are becoming increasingly disconnected with the cities they live in. Election turnouts in cities around the world are falling. In Rio, for example, voting is required by law. However, in one election, nearly 30 percent of people did not vote; instead they stayed home and chose to pay a fine instead.
"Are becoming" (present continuous) signals an ongoing process — not a completed fact but a trend still unfolding. "Increasingly" is a degree adverb indicating the process is accelerating — getting worse over time, not stabilising. "Disconnected" (past participle used as adjective) frames the relationship between people and city as a broken link. Together, the three words create a troubling dynamic: a progressive, worsening state of separation. The author signals urgency: if nothing changes, disconnection will only deepen.
Reading 12

Falling Participation

According to Orofino, people are becoming increasingly disconnected with the cities they live in. Election turnouts in cities around the world are falling. In Rio, for example, voting is required by law. However, in one election, nearly 30 percent of people did not vote; instead they stayed home and chose to pay a fine instead.
Simple present ("Turnouts fall") would describe a habitual fact or general truth — almost neutral. Present continuous ("are falling") emphasises active change: this is happening right now, it is in motion. The continuous aspect makes the decline feel visible and alarming, rather than a static description. It also creates a parallel with "are becoming" in the previous sentence, building a pattern of progressive deterioration across the paragraph. This repetition of present continuous is a stylistic device that accumulates urgency.
Reading 13

Legal Obligation

According to Orofino, people are becoming increasingly disconnected with the cities they live in. Election turnouts in cities around the world are falling. In Rio, for example, voting is required by law. However, in one election, nearly 30 percent of people did not vote; instead they stayed home and chose to pay a fine instead.
This sentence is a contextual setup: by telling us voting is legally compulsory, the author dramatically raises the stakes of the statistic that follows. If voting were optional, low turnout would be unremarkable. But if not voting means breaking the law (and paying a fine), then choosing not to vote is an act of deliberate refusal — a much stronger signal of disconnection. The passive ("is required") makes the legal obligation sound impersonal and absolute, heightening the impact of the rebellion described in the next sentence.
Reading 14

Choosing Apathy

According to Orofino, people are becoming increasingly disconnected with the cities they live in. Election turnouts in cities around the world are falling. In Rio, for example, voting is required by law. However, in one election, nearly 30 percent of people did not vote; instead they stayed home and chose to pay a fine instead.
"Chose" implies conscious agency: these people were not prevented from voting — they decided not to. The verb upgrades their inaction from passive absence to active refusal. The phrase "instead" (used twice — "instead they stayed home" / "to pay a fine instead") reinforces the deliberate trade: participation was traded for disconnection, even at a financial cost. This choice is deeply alarming for democratic societies: citizens who actively opt out of civic life, even when legally obligated, are signalling profound alienation.
Reading 15

Social Disconnection

Orofino also believes that cities cause us to be disconnected from one another. As new buildings are built, many public spaces disappear. Without these places, it's difficult for people to socialise, make friends, and form a close and happy community.
"Us" includes both the writer and the reader — it is inclusive first person. Compared to the more distant "people", "us" makes the disconnection personal and shared. The reader is no longer an observer of a social problem; they are a participant in it. This is a persuasive technique: by pulling the reader into the sentence, the author creates a sense of shared vulnerability and collective responsibility. It also positions Orofino as someone who speaks from inside the problem, not above it.
Reading 16

Loss of Public Space

Orofino also believes that cities cause us to be disconnected from one another. As new buildings are built, many public spaces disappear. Without these places, it's difficult for people to socialise, make friends, and form a close and happy community.
The structure is causal simultaneity: "as" signals that both events happen at the same time, and one causes the other. The two present tenses ("are built" / "disappear") make this a universal present truth — an ongoing pattern, not a single past event. The sentence argues that urban development is inherently destructive to social infrastructure. Notably, "are built" is passive (buildings grow without human-named agents), while "disappear" is active — as if the spaces vanish on their own, helplessly. This asymmetry subtly reinforces a sense of inevitability and loss.
Reading 17

Consequences of Loss

Orofino also believes that cities cause us to be disconnected from one another. As new buildings are built, many public spaces disappear. Without these places, it's difficult for people to socialise, make friends, and form a close and happy community.
The list moves from simple interaction → personal bond → collective identity: socialise (casual, low-stakes contact) → make friends (deeper, bilateral connection) → form a close and happy community (shared, lasting group identity). This progression is intentional: it shows that community-building is cumulative — it starts with small encounters in public space and grows into something much larger. By removing public spaces, cities interrupt this process at the very first step. The adjectives "close and happy" add an emotional dimension: what is lost is not just function, but wellbeing.

Section Heading

Meu Rio: A Solution

"Meu Rio" means "My Rio" — a network that puts the city back in citizens' hands

Reading 18

The Core Belief

Orofino believes that getting citizens to work together and be more involved with the running of their cities is hugely important. To this end, Orofino cofounded a group called Meu Rio. Meu Rio is an online network that makes it easier for Rio citizens to have their say about the running of the city. As part of the network, people receive news updates and are able to participate in important decisions about the future of their city.
A gerund subject ("getting citizens to…") foregrounds process and agency — someone must actively do the "getting". In contrast, a noun ("citizen participation") is static and abstract. The gerund implies that change doesn't happen automatically; it requires intervention and effort. This subtly establishes Orofino as a necessary actor — someone who must make participation happen, not wait for it. The adverb "hugely" amplifies the importance, making this a strong personal conviction rather than a polite observation.
Reading 19

The Organisation

Orofino believes that getting citizens to work together and be more involved with the running of their cities is hugely important. To this end, Orofino cofounded a group called Meu Rio. Meu Rio is an online network that makes it easier for Rio citizens to have their say about the running of the city. As part of the network, people receive news updates and are able to participate in important decisions about the future of their city.
"To this end" is a cohesive device that functions as a purpose connector — it refers back to the belief stated in the previous sentence and signals that the action described is the deliberate response to that belief. "So" would be informal and merely sequential (like "and then"). "To this end" is formal and purposive — it says the co-founding of Meu Rio is not incidental but a direct enactment of Orofino's values. It elevates the founding of the group from a biographical fact to a principled act.
Reading 20

How It Works

Orofino believes that getting citizens to work together and be more involved with the running of their cities is hugely important. To this end, Orofino cofounded a group called Meu Rio. Meu Rio is an online network that makes it easier for Rio citizens to have their say about the running of the city. As part of the network, people receive news updates and are able to participate in important decisions about the future of their city.
Literally, "have their say" means to be given the opportunity to speak. Figuratively, it means to exercise one's right to voice an opinion on matters that affect you. The idiom is more colloquial and human than "express their opinions" — it sounds like something Orofino might actually say. It connects to the article's broader theme of voice and agency: citizens don't just have opinions; they have a say — implying that their voice has power to influence outcomes. The idiom also carries a democratic connotation that formal equivalents lack.
Reading 21

Membership Benefits

Orofino believes that getting citizens to work together and be more involved with the running of their cities is hugely important. To this end, Orofino cofounded a group called Meu Rio. Meu Rio is an online network that makes it easier for Rio citizens to have their say about the running of the city. As part of the network, people receive news updates and are able to participate in important decisions about the future of their city.
"Receive" is passive — it describes information flowing to the citizen (news updates). "Are able to participate" is active — it describes power flowing from the citizen (making decisions). The contrast is deliberate: the network first informs, then empowers. In civic terms, participation is the more powerful right because it changes outcomes, not just awareness. The phrase "are able to" (modal construction) is slightly weaker than "do participate", but signals that the possibility exists — and possibility is what was previously denied.
Reading 22

Measuring Success

Meu Rio has been a huge success. More than 200,000 Rio citizens are now part of this online community. Orofino is hopeful that projects like hers will become common in cities around the world, and will start what she calls "a participation revolution."
Present perfect ("has been") signals a past event or process with current relevance. "Was a success" (past simple) would imply it is over. "Is a success" (present) would make it a current state. "Has been" uniquely captures: the success started in the past and continues to be relevant now. This is the current relevance use of the present perfect. The opening short declarative sentence also functions as a topic sentence — a bold claim that the following data (200,000 members) will immediately validate.
Reading 23

Scale & Evidence

Meu Rio has been a huge success. More than 200,000 Rio citizens are now part of this online community. Orofino is hopeful that projects like hers will become common in cities around the world, and will start what she calls "a participation revolution."
"More than" signals the number is a minimum floor, not a ceiling — the real figure is actually larger, which makes the achievement sound even bigger. It also signals that the exact count is less important than the scale. "Are now part of" is a deliberate word choice: "part of" implies belonging and identity, not merely registration. You don't just join a community; you become part of it. This reframes the membership figure as a social fact — 200,000 people who now feel they belong to something larger than themselves.
Reading 24

The Participation Revolution

Meu Rio has been a huge success. More than 200,000 Rio citizens are now part of this online community. Orofino is hopeful that projects like hers will become common in cities around the world, and will start what she calls "a participation revolution."
The phrase "what she calls" is a distancing hedge: it attributes the label "participation revolution" to Orofino, not to the author — preserving journalistic objectivity. The quotation marks further signal this is her own coinage, a deliberate expression of her vision, not generic language. "Revolution" is a powerful word — it implies not just change but a fundamental shift in power relations. By keeping it in quotes and attributing it to Orofino, the author lets her voice carry its full ambition while the author remains neutral. This is a classic technique for inserting a provocative idea without endorsing it outright.
Language 25

Passive Voice: Power & Agency

The article uses passive voice strategically. Analyse who has power in each sentence.

A) Residents are provided with convenience, culture, and jobs.

B) In Rio, voting is required by law.

C) As new buildings are built, many public spaces disappear. ← mixed

D) RULE: Passive removes the agent. Ask: who does the action? Who benefits / suffers?

Classify each sentence: agent hidden intentionally agent obvious / unimportant creates objectivity
Then rewrite B as active voice. Does the meaning change?

A — Agent hidden intentionally: "The city" (or planners/government) provides residents, but the passive removes them. Residents appear as passive recipients, subtly reinforcing Orofino's critique that citizens have no power.

B — Creates objectivity: "The law requires voting" is the active version. The passive "is required by law" sounds more impersonal and absolute — as if the requirement comes from an untouchable system. The meaning is the same, but the passive feels more authoritative.

C — Mixed: "Are built" (passive, unnamed builders) vs "disappear" (active, spaces as agent). This asymmetry makes development feel faceless and public space loss feel inevitable — powerful framing.

D — Key Rule: When passive hides a human agent, always ask why. In journalism and persuasion, hidden agents often represent power structures the author wants readers to question.
Language 26

Present Perfect vs. Simple Past

Both tenses describe past events. The difference lies in connection to the present.

A) Rio has grown extremely quickly over the last 60 years. [present perfect]

B) Meu Rio has been a huge success. [present perfect]

C) In one election, 30% of people did not vote. [simple past] ← specific event

D) RULE: Present perfect = past action + still relevant now. Simple past = completed, closed.

Task: Why does the author use present perfect in A and B but simple past in C?
ongoing relevance specific completed event current result

A — Ongoing relevance: Rio's growth started in the past and its effects are still visible and relevant today. Present perfect emphasises this continuity. "Rio grew" (simple past) would suggest the growth is over.

B — Current result: Meu Rio's success is a past process with a present result (200,000 members now). The present perfect captures both the journey and its lasting impact.

C — Simple past for a specific event: The election non-voting happened at a specific, identifiable moment in the past ("in one election"). Simple past is correct for a single, completed, time-specific event. Present perfect would be wrong here — we are not saying the non-voting is still happening now.

Pattern: Use present perfect when you want readers to feel the past is still alive. Use simple past when you want to place an event firmly in the past.
Language 27

Degree Adverbs & Hedging Language

How strongly does the author claim things? Analyse the strength of each claim.

A) People are becoming increasingly disconnected. [degree adverb — scalable]

B) Modern city life is far from ideal. [degree phrase — strong negative]

C) Getting citizens involved is hugely important. [intensifier — emphasis] ✗ "very important"

D) RULE: Choose degree words that match your claim's strength — avoid vague "very/really".

Task: Replace each highlighted word with a weaker/stronger alternative. How does the meaning shift?
increasingly → slightly far from → not quite hugely → somewhat

A — "increasingly" → "slightly": "Slightly disconnected" implies a minor, perhaps unimportant drift. "Increasingly" implies an accelerating, dangerous trend. The choice signals whether the problem is worth urgent action.

B — "far from" → "not quite": "Not quite ideal" sounds almost acceptable — as if the city is close to perfect. "Far from ideal" signals a significant gap that demands change. The two phrases make completely different arguments about the severity of the problem.

C — "hugely" → "somewhat": "Somewhat important" sounds lukewarm and optional. "Hugely important" makes civic participation sound like a moral imperative. The intensifier carries Orofino's passion — without it, her motivation for founding Meu Rio becomes puzzling.

Writing tip: "Very" and "really" are weak because they add no information. Specific degree words (increasingly, far from, hugely, extraordinarily) carry both scale and attitude.
🌐

Lesson Complete

Unit 8 Key Takeaways

🏙️

Cities are growing globally — but bigger doesn't mean better connected

🗳️

Citizens disengage when they feel unheard — even breaking laws to do so

🏞️

Losing public space means losing the foundation of community

📲

Digital civic networks can restore the voice cities take away

a participation revolution.

— Alessandra Orofino, Meu Rio